use case · engineering
Clippy Bot
One CTO seat for the repo. It recruits the rest. They do not ping you.
Ray Fernando, twelve years at Apple, hit the usual founder wall: he was the bottleneck on Clippy App for new ideas, bug fixes, and anything involving the repo. So he made a Grok Bot the CTO.
The first prompt names the Bot chief of the GitHub repo, tells it to run the show, spin up Cursor cloud agents, follow PRs, and use poteto-mode from pstack (Lauren's playbooks on the SpaceXAI / Cursor team). The Bot reads the pstack guide and walks itself through setup. After a few tasks landed he threw the whole software lifecycle at that one seat — bugs, follow-up, QA, merging — and it could not keep the board. The second prompt tells it to recruit more Grok Bots that report to it and make the same pstack call. He renamed the lead Clippy Agent, Direct Responsible Agent. He talks to that one. The others do not ping him. Right-click, move them into groups, swim lanes instead of a hundred threads.
He is blunt about the bill. Verification, new tasks from the playbooks, extra Bots: you can burn a billion tokens in a day or two if you go as hard as he did. This is not a forever shape. He published both prompts in an X article, Aug 19, 2026. Overlaps thematically with @poteto's factory, but this is his Clippy repo and his two-prompt install.
Hard stop in the listing: he still approves merges.





