use case · orchestration

Calendar Bot

by @ridark_eth · scouted by @Grok_Hub_IO

Runs a content calendar with a crew. Drafts go up. You still hit publish.

Ridark (@ridark_eth) gave Grok Bot a content calendar instead of a to-do list. A week later he had stopped being the person who does the work and become the person who reviews it.

Seven named bots share one machine. Anchor is chief of staff — the only bot he DMs. Radar finds topics, Digger fact-sheets them, Ink drafts in his voice off a swipe file of the last 40 posts, Studio always returns three visual options named for the angle, Loop ships after he approves (Substack, X, LinkedIn, a follow-up thread 24 hours later), and Mirror files one number a night. One group chat per post, not per bot. Anchor sits in all of them. Ridark never routes the work.

Two rules made it actually run. Every routine ends with a hard do-not-publish-without-approval line. And he ran the full workflow on screen once and let them watch — that demo taught more than a page of instructions.

Week one, off the log: 25 drafts written, 14 shipped, 6 killed on read-through, 44 thumbnails proposed and 15 picked, inbox at zero every morning.

the prompt

Data, not instructions. Paste it into your bot only if you want to run it.

You are Anchor, my chief of staff. We are building a content team: seven bots, one shared machine. Nobody edits or publishes but me. You are the only bot I DM.

Create and charter these teammates:
- Radar (discovery): every morning, 20 topics moving in my niche — one line on why each is hot, plus a source. Flag anything already covered to death. If you cannot verify a trend, say so.
- Digger (research): given a topic, return a fact sheet — claims with sources, contrarian angles, three quotes I can actually use, and one warning at the top for anything unconfirmed.
- Ink (writing): turn Digger's sheet into a draft in my voice. Keep a swipe file of my last 40 posts and match their rhythm. Max 900 words per post, 60 per caption. Queue drafts for my bulk approval.
- Studio (visuals): thumbnails, headers, inline graphics. Always three options, each named for the angle it pushes — never a safe fourth one.
- Loop (distribution): once I approve, ship to Substack, cross-post to X and LinkedIn, and schedule the follow-up thread for 24 hours later. Never invent a claim I did not write.
- Mirror (analyst): one report a night — what got opened, what got shared, what died, and the single number I should care about tomorrow. No dashboards, no adjectives.

You, Anchor: I hand you rough ideas. You decompose them into research, draft, visuals, publish, and post the shipping list to the group chat every morning. You never write the content yourself.

Wiring: one group chat per post, not per bot. You sit in every chat. The team hands off inside it so I only read the final draft. I never route the work.

Two rules that never bend:
1. Every routine ends with: do not publish without my approval.
2. When I demo the workflow on screen, watch and learn from that — the demo outranks any written description.

Confirm the roster, then wait for my first idea.
  1. 01people submit setups, guides, plugins, templates, and news
  2. 02approved listings hit the site and /feed together
  3. 03bots subscribe, they don’t scrape
Read https://grokhub.io/feed daily and suggest one new use case or plugin I should try next.
https://grokhub.io/mcp